ANRF MAHA Leapfrog Demonstrators for Societal Innovation in India

Objectives

The ANRF MAHA Leapfrog Demonstrators for Societal Innovation in India program seeks to catalyse bold, integrated, and scalable solutions to India's most pressing societal challenges through research and innovation.


India's challenges demands solutions that go beyond incremental improvement - ones that address these challenges meaningfully, reach those who need them most, and show a credible path to scale adoption. Aligned with the national mandate to focus on India-centric problems and globally competitive solutions, this Call for Proposals (CFP) supports Leapfrog Demonstrations- integrated, research-driven demonstrators that validate transformative technical, economic, and/or social hypotheses at meaningful scale.


'Leapfrog Demonstrator' in this context, are projects that demonstrate how cutting edge research accelerate the transition of innovative solutions, from development stages to scalable high impact deployment. The focus is on deliberately designed research interventions to demonstrate transformative potential at scale. Such projects must go beyond laboratory-scale validation and demonstrate advancement along multiple dimensions of maturity.

Examples include projects that,


  • Demonstrate leap in technical maturity, with solutions validated beyond controlled lab environments, showing performance under real-world conditions;
  • Provide evidence of adoption and usability across relevant stakeholders (e.g., communities, farmers, public agencies, industry), indicating that the leapfrog solution addresses a clearly articulated need and is functionally deployable;
  • Show proof of scalability through field-level implementation, which may vary by domain (e.g., multi-site pilots, district-level deployments, or context-specific operational environments such as disaster-prone regions etc.);
  • Establish economic viability, including optimisation of performance and cost, support transition toward a plausible pathway for sustainable and large-scale deployment.

The program complements existing MAHA Mission Mode initiatives by accelerating innovation in societally critical domains through collaborative consortia. This program operates under two tracks:


A. Challenges Track

Directed calls based on clearly defined national problem statements with measurable goals and mission-oriented outcomes. ANRF publishes the defined challenges under this track with each call.


  • Respond to a Defined National Challenge - Proposals must directly address the stated challenge and articulate why the proposed approach represents a transformational rather than incremental response. A compelling AS-IS vs TO-BE scenario at national or regional scale is required.
  • Demonstrate a Leapfrog Solution - Proposals must explicitly describe the Leapfrog Demonstrator in capability, access, performance, or societal outcome it achieves along with the hypotheses it validates and the benchmarks that define success.
  • Build Validated Evidence for Scale - Proposals must present a rigorous validation and benchmarking framework spanning technical, economic, and socio-technical dimensions, making a credible, multi-dimensional case for scale adoption.
  • Embed a Translation Pathway - Proposals must include a concrete scale-up plan demonstrating how demonstrated results translate to national deployment, with clear milestones and adoption mechanisms (e.g. regulatory, compliances).
  • Present a Capable Consortium - Proposals must demonstrate a clearly structured hub-and-spoke consortium with defined roles and committed partners across academia, industry, Startups, and where relevant, non-government and civil society.


Preliminary list of Challenges can be found here (Annexure - I)


B. Open Proposals Track

Proposals aligned with listed strategic societal areas, where applicants define the specific challenge and leapfrog solution framework.

.
  • Define and Justify a National Challenge - Proposals must independently establish the challenge being addressed making a rigorous case for why it is significant at national or regional scale, why it remains unresolved, and why it demands transformation rather than iteration. A detailed AS-IS vs TO-BE scenario is required to substantiate the stakes..
  • Propose a Leapfrog Demonstrator - Proposals must articulate a bold, integrated solution that goes well beyond incremental improvement. They must describe what the Demonstrator will validate, what hypotheses it tests, and how success will be measured against independently verifiable benchmarks.
  • Generate Multi-Dimensional Real-World Evidence - Proposals must present a validation framework that spans technical, economic, and socio-technical dimensions building a credible and independently defensible case for why the demonstrated solution can scale.
  • Demonstrate a Credible Path to Scale - Since the problem is self-defined, proposals must present a proof on translation. The scale-up plan must include concrete milestones, stakeholder pathways, and adoption mechanisms and must make a convincing case how demonstrated results will translate to real-world impact.
  • Build and Lead an Innovation Ecosystem - Proposals must present a clearly structured hub-and-spoke consortium and, given the self-directed nature of this track, must make a compelling case for why this particular team is uniquely positioned to lead the transformation. Partners across academia, industry, start-ups, and where relevant, government and civil society must be identified with defined roles and commitments.


Areas of Support
Illustrative strategic areas include (but are not limited to):

  • Reimagining agriculture: resilience and sustainability
  • Radical energy efficiency
  • Reimagining transportation & safety
  • Air, water, and industrial pollution
  • Waste-to-wealth
  • Smarter infrastructure
  • Biodiversity preservation & monetization
  • Skilling and jobs
  • Community Health
  • Sports Science, Physical Literacy & Health
  • Economic Inclusion:
    • AI enabled digital literacy solutions for improving financial products utilization.
    • Financial products for credit, investments, insurance responsive to customer value-chain needs.


Note 1: Proposals submitted under the Open Track (Track B) must be distinct from the predefined Challenges (Track A). Strategic areas and problem statements explicitly listed under the Challenges Track are not eligible for consideration in the Open Track.

Note 2: ANRF reserves the right to redirect proposals to appropriate Mission Mode Programs if deemed better aligned elsewhere.


Nature and Extent of Support (Track A and Track B) :

(A) LARGE Projects

  • Total Project Budget: ₹25 Crores to ₹100+ Crores
  • ANRF Contribution: Up to ₹50 Crores
  • Minimum 50% Cost Sharing in Cash
  • Duration: Up to 60 months

(B) MEDIUM Projects

  • Total Project Budget: ₹10 Crores to ₹25 Crores
  • ANRF Contribution: Up to ₹12.5 Crores
  • Minimum 50% Cost Sharing in Cash
  • Duration: Up to 60 months


The balance amount (Total project cost - ANRF contribution) in cash may come from any non ANRF sources who may/may not be already ANRF partners in the program e.g., philanthropy, industry contribution etc.


General Guidelines:

  • Cost sharing must be in cash from non-ANRF sources.
  • In-kind contributions may be provided over and above the minimum cash requirement.
  • Financial contributions must align with technological and scaling goals.
  • The Lead Institution will receive and manage all funds and distribute them to eligible partners.


Eligibility Conditions:

Lead Institution and Lead Principal Investigator Eligibility


Each proposal must be submitted by a Lead Institution, headed by a Lead Principal Investigator (PI). The Lead PI

  • Must hold a regular position at: Academic institutions / National Research Laboratories (NRLs). Lead PI can also be from Recognized not-for-profit Research Institutions / Section 8 companies whose object clause is aligned with program goals.
  • Must Be Indian citizen or OCI holder.
  • Must Hold a Ph.D. in Science, Engineering, Mathematics, relevant Social Sciences, or M.D./M.S./M.D.S./M.V.Sc.
  • PIs from academic institutions / NRLs and nearing superannuation, may apply with a Co-PI having at least 5 years of service remaining. INSPIRE, Ramanujan, and Ramalingaswamy Fellows, may participate as Co-PIs.


A Hub-and-Spoke model is preferred, wherein:

  • The Lead Institution (Hub) anchors integration, coordination, and demonstrator validation.
  • Partner institutions (Spokes) contribute domain expertise, field validation, translational pathways, or deployment capabilities.
  • Eligible Spoke Institutions can be academic institutions, national research laboratories, Section 8 companies and DSIR SIRO recognised organizations including NGOs. NGOs must have a valid DARPAN portal registration, and must have valid DSIR SIRO recognition to receive direct grant-in-aid under the program.
  • Co-PIs from spoke institutions affiliated with recognized not-for-profit research institutions or Section 8 companies must possess at least a Master's degree and a minimum of five years of relevant domain experience.
  • Consortium roles must be clearly defined and aligned with translational and scale objectives.

Within the hub-and-spoke consortium, proposals must include the following in the capacity of Co-PI or Honorary PI, as applicable.


  • Industry and/or Start-up collaborators / MSMEs.
  • Translational partners relevant to scale-up pathways.
  • Where appropriate, state/local government or civil society partners / NGOs.

Start-ups, MSMEs, Industry and NGOs without a valid DSIR SIRO recognition, will not receive grant-in-aid funding under this program. However, they can be compensated:


  • For specific services relevant to the proposed research or deliverable or for delivery of defined products, components, prototypes, validation services, or other measurable outcomes, through contractual arrangements with the Lead Institution.
  • All such arrangements must be transparently structured and justified as part of the overall cost-sharing framework within the project budget.

All proposals must demonstrate a transformative leapfrog ambition, a well-structured demonstration approach, and a credible, evidence-backed pathway to national scale.


Proposals must articulate the Leapfrog Demonstrator with sufficient clarity and rigour. The following questions are indicative prompts to help structure the proposal:


  • Leapfrog Demonstrator
    • What constitutes the Demonstrator and what does it produce?
    • What hypotheses does it validate?
    • Why does the current state of research and innovation fall short?
    • Why now - what has changed in technology, data, regulation, or cost that makes this possible in 2026?
    • Is there a comparable leapfrog elsewhere in the world or in India?
    • What benchmarks define success?
    • How does it differ fundamentally from an incremental approach?
  • Integrate Research and Translation
    • The Demonstrator must integrate research, engineering validation, field testing, and translational pathways into a single unified framework not as sequential phases but as co-designed components.
  • Establish Scientific Validation
    • Include measurable validation metrics, benchmarking frameworks, and real-world testing strategies.
    • Define Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) in a controlled lab environment.
    • Define KPIs in a real-world field environment.
    • Define KPIs that demonstrate potential for national scale-up.
  • Enable Scalable Translation
    • Provide a compelling translation and scale-up plan beyond simple technology licensing.
    • Include concrete milestones, stakeholder pathways, and adoption mechanism.
  • Promote Dissemination and Durability
    • Artifacts and prototypes must be widely disseminated post-project.
    • Models and datasets must be maintained and accessible beyond the grant period.
    • All outputs developed through public funding must remain replicable and open.
  • Open innovation models (e.g., open-source software, open designs, open licensing under ANRF guidelines) are encouraged but not mandatory.

Stage 1: Pre-Proposal


Must include:

  • Problem statement and strategic alignment (Track specification: Challenges or Open).
  • Clear articulation of the Leapfrog Demonstration.
  • AS-IS vs TO-BE scenario at scale.
  • Core hypotheses.
  • Integrated research and validation plan.
  • Translation and scale strategy.
  • Consortium structure (including hub-and-spoke architecture).
  • Roles of partners.
  • Cost-sharing plan.

Pre-proposals weak in impact potential, integration, validation, cost-sharing clarity, or translational plan will not be considered for further evaluation.


Stage 2: Full Proposal (Only by invitation)


Submission within 30 days of invitation must include:

  • Detailed technical plan and milestones.
  • Validation metrics and benchmarks.
  • Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with each consortium partner highlighting clear roles, responsibilities and work distribution.
  • Budget justification.
  • Letters of Intent (LoIs) from non-governmental partners specifying:
    • Role and commitment,
    • Resources and facilities,
    • In-cash contributions,
    • Engagement in translation and scale-up.

The process may generally include


For Pre-Proposal

  • Administrative and technical screening.
  • Standing Committee evaluation.

For Full Proposal

  • External technical reviews
  • Ranking by Standing Committee
  • Final approval by ANRF Steering and Oversight Committee.

Evaluation Criteria include but not limited to:

  • Societal impact potential.
  • Strength and clarity of Leapfrog Demonstration.
  • Scientific rigor and validation approach.
  • Credibility of translation and scale pathway.
  • Strength of hub-and-spoke consortium model.
  • Financial robustness and cost sharing.
  • Portfolio balance and budget considerations.
  • Pre-proposals must be submitted exclusively through the ANRF online portal.
  • Submissions through other modes will not be considered.
  • At least two calls per year are expected, subject to budget availability.
  • Intellectual Property: Intellectual property rights shall be governed in accordance with the ANRF IP Policy. While compliance with this policy is the baseline, we encourage ANRF open license arrangements. In select challenges, particularly those involving philanthropy partners, an open IP will be a requirement.
  • The Lead Institution will bear financial and administrative responsibility of the project.
  • ANRF reserves the right to modify program conditions subject to strategic or budgetary considerations. ANRF reserves the right to withdraw the CFP or any of the listed challenges or research areas, at any stage without notice.
  • The Call for Proposals does not constitute an offer, commitment, or entitlement and creates no obligations on ANRF or Government of India.
  • Submission of pre-proposal / full proposal does not guarantee future engagement or funding, which will follow formal evaluation processes under the Mission's operational guidelines. ANRF's decision will be final.

 

  • Endorsement letter
  • Certificate from Investigators
  • Letters of support for non-ANRF funds from other sources

 

Ms Soni Koul
Program Director (Technical)
Email: principal-expert1[at]anrf[dot]gov[dot]in


Dr. S.V. Prasanna
Program Officer / Scientist - E
Email: prasanna[dot]sv[at]anrf[dot]gov[dot]in